top of page

Explainer-Is the Hezbollah-Israel conflict about to spiral?

Is the Hezbollah-Israel conflict about to spiral?
Israel's Iron Dome anti-missile system intercepts rockets launched from Lebanon towards Israel over the Israeli Lebanese border, as seen from northern Israel, April 12, 2024. Ayal Margolin /File Photo

The conflict between Israel and Lebanon's Hezbollah is dangerously poised after more than eight months of fighting triggered by the Gaza war, with hostilities escalating and both sides signalling a readiness for a bigger confrontation.


The U.S. State Department said on Tuesday that Washington does not want to see a full-blown war and that it is trying to pursue a diplomatic solution, adding that Israel had the right to defend itself from the Iran-backed Hezbollah.


But political pressure is building in Israel for tougher action against the heavily armed group.


This is a primer on the conflict:


WHY ARE THEY FIGHTING?


Hezbollah began trading fire with Israel on Oct. 8, a day after the Palestinian militant group Hamas attacked communities in southern Israel and sparked the Gaza war.


Hezbollah, a Hamas ally, says its attacks aim to support Palestinians under Israeli bombardment in Gaza.


The violence is part of the regional spillover of the Gaza war, which has drawn in Iran-backed militants across the region. Hezbollah is widely deemed the most powerful member of the Iran-backed network, known as the Axis of Resistance.


While linked to Gaza, the conflict has its own dynamics.


Israel and Hezbollah have fought numerous wars.


The last was in 2006.


Israel has long viewed Hezbollah as the biggest threat at its borders and has been deeply alarmed by its growing arsenal, and the foothold it has established in Syria.


Hezbollah's ideology is largely defined by conflict with Israel. It was founded by Iran's Revolutionary Guards in 1982 to fight Israeli forces that had invaded Lebanon that year, and waged years of guerrilla war that led Israel to withdraw from south Lebanon in 2000.


Hezbollah deems Israel an illegitimate state established on occupied Palestinian lands and wants to see it gone.



WHAT'S THE IMPACT SO FAR?


The conflict has already taken a toll on both sides.


Tens of thousands of people have been forced to flee their homes on both sides of the border. Israeli airstrikes have pounded areas where Hezbollah operates in southern Lebanon and struck the Bekaa Valley near the Syrian border.


Israel has also occasionally hit elsewhere, notably killing a senior Hamas commander in Beirut on Jan. 2.


Israeli strikes have killed some 300 Hezbollah fighters in Lebanon - more than it lost in 2006, according to a Reuters tally. Around 80 civilians have been killed, according to a Reuters tally.


Attacks from Lebanon have killed 18 Israeli soldiers and 10 civilians, Israel says.


In Israel, the displacement of so many Israelis is a big political issue. Officials hope they will be able to go home for the school year beginning Sept. 1.


HOW MUCH WORSE COULD IT GET?


A lot. Despite the ferocity of these hostilities, this is still seen as a relatively contained confrontation.


Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Wednesday Israel was prepared for strong action in the north. He warned in December that Beirut would be turned "into Gaza" if Hezbollah started an all-out war.


Hezbollah deputy leader Sheikh Naim Qassem signalled on Tuesday the group was not seeking to widen the conflict but he also said Hezbollah was ready to fight any war imposed on it.


In an interview with Al Jazeera, he said Hezbollah had used a small part of its capabilities. Any move by Israel to expand the conflict would be met by "devastation, destruction and displacement" in Israel, he said.


Past wars have inflicted heavy damage.


In 2006, Israeli strikes levelled large areas of Beirut's Hezbollah-controlled southern suburbs, knocked out Beirut airport, and hit roads, bridges and other infrastructure. Nearly 1 million people in Lebanon fled their homes.


In Israel, the impact included 300,000 people fleeing their homes to escape Hezbollah rockets and some 2,000 homes destroyed.


Hezbollah has a far bigger arsenal than in 2006, including rockets it says can hit all parts of Israel.


It has demonstrated advances in its weaponry since October, shooting down Israeli drones, launching its own explosive drones into Israel, and firing more sophisticated guided missiles.


Israeli troops have invaded Lebanon several times, reaching as far as Beirut in the 1982 invasion which aimed to crush Lebanon-based Palestinian guerrillas.


IS ESCALATION AVOIDABLE?


Washington and Paris have been seeking de-escalation.


"We've heard Israeli leaders say the solution that they prefer is a diplomatic solution. And obviously that is the solution that we prefer too and that we're trying to pursue," U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said on Tuesday. The United States deems Hezbollah a terrorist group.


Hezbollah has signalled its eventual openness to an agreement that benefits Lebanon, but has said there can be no discussions until Israel halts the Gaza offensive - something mediators are struggling to achieve.


Israel has also indicated its openness to a diplomatic settlement that would restore security in the north, whilst preparing for a military offensive to achieve the same goal.


"Whoever thinks that they can harm us and we will sit idly by is making a big mistake," Netanyahu said on Wednesday. "In one way or another we will restore security to the north."


The U.S. official at the heart of diplomatic contacts, Amos Hochstein, brokered an unlikely diplomatic deal between Lebanon and Israel in 2022 over their disputed maritime boundary.


Hochstein said on May 30 he did not expect peace between Hezbollah and Israel but that a set of understandings could remove some of the impetus for conflict and establish a recognised border between Lebanon and Israel.


A French proposal submitted to Beirut in February included elite Hezbollah fighters withdrawing 10 km (6 miles) from the frontier and negotiations aimed at settling disputes over the land border.

Source: Reuters

Comentários


Top Stories

Advertise Now (1).png
India Ex-DGMO Bhatt: Drones, Space & Cyber Warfare Redefining Conflicts| Defense & Security Insights
37:04

India Ex-DGMO Bhatt: Drones, Space & Cyber Warfare Redefining Conflicts| Defense & Security Insights

Lt. Gen. Anil Bhatt (Retd) reveals how drones, space, and cyberspace are reshaping modern warfare. He reflects on Operation Sindoor, the Doklam standoff, and India's new military paradigm. “War is serious business,” he says, stressing preparation as a deterrent. Don't miss this exclusive Operation Sindoor has brought into sharp focus the importance of drones in modern warfare, which along with space and cyberspace will write the new paradigm of future military conflicts, a former Director General of Military Operation who oversaw the Doklam crisis, has said. In an interview on Thursday, retired Lt. Gen. Anil Kumar Bhatt also expressed his displeasure at suggestions in social media by many war mongers who were unhappy with the conflict ending in four days on the grounds that it was an opportunity to reclaim Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. He said war should be the last option and should not be waged since India had achieved its strategic aims. “Let me tell you, a war or taking back Pak-occupied Kashmir, should be a war of choice, taken by a decision. That is not what was planned this time. Yes, the Indian military was prepared for it, if the escalating ladder took you there,” said Bhatt, who is guiding the growth of the private space technology sector in the country after retirement in June 2020. As DGMO, Bhatt was one of the most senior military officers in the hierarchy in-charge of ensuring that the armed forces were operationally ready at all times. Reporting directly to the army chief, the DGMO is intimately involved in shaping strategies to deal with immediate and long-term security challenges, besides coordinating with the other two services as well as civilian and paramilitary security forces. In times of crisis and escalated tensions, it falls on the DGMO to communicate with his opposite number. Currently, the DGMO is Lt. Gen. Rajiv Ghai. Bhatt was DGMO in 2017 when India was locked in a 73-day military standoff with China in Doklam tri-junction near the Sikkim sector of the Line of Actual Control (LAC). A four-star Lieutenant General is the second highest rank in the army, below a five-star General. A Field Marshal is largely a ceremonial or war-time rank. “So what I would tell all my fellow countrymen is, war is a serious business. A very very serious business. And a nation goes for it when all possible options are over. We had options less than war (during the current crisis) and gave a sense to it,” said Bhatt, who spent 38 years in the Army. Asked how important the drones were in the latest conflict he said the unmanned aerial vehicles have created an entirely new paradigm in warfare and the militaries of the world began focussing on it when they achieved spectacular success for Azerbaijan in winning a nearly-lost war against a well-armed Armenia. The drones were Turkish made. Turkey also supplied drones to Pakistan, which sent swarms of them over Indian air space for surveillance and sometimes lethal payloads. Bhatt agreed that relatively inexpensive drones costing as little as Rs two lakh were able to destroy armoured tanks worth Rs. 20 to 30 crore in the two Azerbaijan-Armenia wars in 2017 and 2020, which made it clear that war theatres of the future will be dotted with drones. To that there are two more new elements, Bhatt noted. “Previously, we used to say that wars are fought on the land, sea and in the air. But, two new domains., very, very effective and important domains – space and cyber space – that are now emerging,” said Bhatt said, who now is the Director General of Indian Space Association, the industry body of the space sector. Bhatt said the space sector was critical to future warfare as satellites play an important role in intelligence gathering, surveillance and reconnaissance, besides guiding missiles and aircraft to their desired targets. “But, in the future every country will have to protect its assets in space and also know what are the adversaries’ assets in space,” he said. Bhatt said several countries have demonstrated anti-satellite weapons and were also developing suicidal satellites that go near an adversary’s satellites and destroy it. He said India has nine or 10 military satellites for surveillance purposes and has plans to put in place a constellation of 52 satellites for space-based surveillance. “These 52 satellites definitely will increase our capability. Today, our gap is filled by companies like Maxar, PlanetM among others. But, we would obviously want our own satellites. Shutter control is very important,” Bhatt said. #Drones #CyberWarfare #SpaceWarfare #IndiaArmy #AnilBhatt #MilitaryTech #OperationSindoor #Doklam #DefenceNews Subscribe to the Amaravati Today, AT World News channel and tap the bell icon to receive notifications whenever we go live https://www.youtube.com/@atnewsroom #atworldnews #atworld #AmaravatiToday
9.png
Live Streams | Facts | Analysis | Explainers | Breaking News

Get in Touch

Manikondu Pvt Ltd
SY. 130P & 115/1P, ISB Rd
Financial District, Gachibowli
Hyderabad, India 500032
letstalk {at} amaravati (dot) today

Follow us on

  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Youtube
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

© 2024 by Amaravati Today | Privacy Policy | Imprint & Dsiclaimer | CIN: U70200TS2024PTC184435

bottom of page